(363) previous ~ index ~ next
To: tdt-distrib@unagi.cis.upenn.edu
From: David Graff <graff@unagi.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: [from Doug Oard:] Re: Ontopic both YES and BRIEF
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:41:30 -0400
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Doug Oard <oard@glue.umd.edu>
To: Jonathan Fiscus <jonathan.fiscus@nist.gov>
cc: TDT Distrib <tdt-distrib@ldc.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Ontopic both YES and BRIEF
In-Reply-To: <3D107242.F97910E9@nist.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
John - I have not looked at any brief stories recently, but my
recollection is that they are often things like:
"And after the break, recent developments in the Chandra Levy
case..." Trying to find such things seems to me to be reasonable, but
using them as a basis for tracking in the n=1 case would seem to me to be
little different than what TREC does (hard to see how you could do much
more than keyword match in an example like the above). So I would suggest
not including briefs in the training stories.
Doug
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Jonathan Fiscus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> At the last TDT meeting, we agreed that stories marked with BRIEF would
> now be considered ontopic in addition to stories marked YES. The
> question I have is with regard to the tracking task: Should stories
> marked as BRIEF be permitted to be training stories?
>
> I'm assuming the answer is yes. Any dissent?
>
> Jon
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from tdt-distrib, email majordomo@ldc.upenn.edu
> with "unsubscribe tdt-distrib" in the body of the message.
>
------- End of Forwarded Message
-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from tdt-distrib, email majordomo@ldc.upenn.edu
with "unsubscribe tdt-distrib" in the body of the message.
(363) previous ~ index ~ next
Last updated Wed Jun 19 11:58:06 2002